š³ļøš„ Supreme Court Slams EC on āVote Choriā Allegations ā Big Transparency Push Coming?
- MediaFx
- 1 day ago
- 2 min read
TL;DR
The Supreme Court just gave the Election Commission (EC) a solid reality check 𤯠over the hot āvote choriā controversy š„. SC asked EC why it canāt publicly display names of voters removed from lists š so people can fix mistakes in 30 days ā³. This comes after opposition protests š© over alleged voter list manipulation in Bihar. EC now says it will share 65 lakh deleted namesĀ in an easy-to-search format š and might even put them online for all to see š.

šØ Supreme Court Throws Shade at EC
The Supreme Court today was in no mood for excuses š. It straight-up asked the EC: āWhy canāt you put deleted voter names on a public board or website?āĀ š¢The logic is simple ā if someone finds their name missing, they get 30 daysĀ to complain and get it fixed š ļø instead of depending on local party workers for info.
Currently, the EC only gives these lists to political parties at the booth level š . But now, after SCās nudge, EC says it will go full transparency modeĀ š” ā giving people direct access to these 65 lakh deleted namesĀ in Bihar.
š£ The āVote Choriā Drama Explained
This whole drama started because of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)Ā of voter lists in Bihar šŗļø. Opposition parties are shouting from rooftops š¤ that itās basically āvote choriāĀ ā meaning voter theft.
Rahul Gandhi called EC āBJPās Election Chori BranchāĀ š¤
Tejashwi Yadav claimed some BJP leaders have two voter cards eachĀ š³
Protests exploded š© with opposition MPs marching from Parliament to the EC office in Delhi šļø. Many were detained š.
š The Numbers Game
Bihar has 7.9 croreĀ registered voters.
7.24 croreĀ responded to the voter list check ā .
That leaves only a smaller chunk potentially affected ā.
The SC said the problem isnāt about mass deletion, but about a trust deficitĀ šµļø between voters and the EC.
š£ļø Peopleās Perspective ā MediaFx Take
See boss, elections are about peopleās powerĀ šŖ. If someoneās name disappears from the list, itās like stealing their voice š£ļø. Whether itās Bihar or anywhere else in India, the process must be open, transparent, and fairĀ š. Why should only party workers see the deleted names? Every citizen deserves that right ā.
When information is locked away, only the powerful benefit š¢. Putting deleted names online will help the common voter ā farmers š¾, workers š ļø, students š ā to claim their rights without begging politicians.
And letās be real ā democracy works best when all votes count equallyĀ š³ļøā¦ not when some votes magically vanish!