top of page
Search

New Voter Rules 2025: Why Old 2002 List Is Suddenly A Big Deal

Key Facts:

  • India’s Election Commission is running a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in 12 states and UTs in 2025.

  • Unlike 2002, many 2025 voters must now prove a link to the 2002 voter list using their own or parents’/grandparents’ details.

  • In 2002, officials went door-to-door, verified every entry themselves, and did not ask citizens to link to any older list.

  • The article says the 2002 process was more inclusive, with stronger accountability on officials and easier inclusion of new/shifted voters.

  • In 2025, missing or wrongly filled forms can lead to names being dropped, with stricter document demands and less on-ground verification.

ree

A new analysis has compared how India cleaned up and updated its voter lists in 2001–02 with how the Election Commission is doing it now in 2025, and the difference is making a lot of people nervous about who might get left out this time. Back in 2002, during a special revision, officials went into the field, integrated old and new rolls, and literally visited homes to verify each name, correct spelling or address mistakes, and note deaths or people who had migrated, all without forcing citizens to prove links to any earlier list. The new 2025 Special Intensive Revision across 12 states flips a lot of that responsibility onto regular voters: people have to fill an enumeration form themselves, show that they or their parents or grandparents were on the 2002 list, and if they can’t, they may get hit with a notice demanding one of a limited set of documents to prove birthplace or birth date or risk being dropped from the final rolls even if they are already voters. The comparison points out that the old system treated enumerators as key gatekeepers who had to verify every entry and hunt for missing or new voters, while the current setup turns Booth Level Officers more into form distributors and data collectors with very little scope to correct errors or fix issues like broken serial numbers or address glitches. It also highlights that in 2002 there were clear steps to add new voters, re-add people whose names were deleted despite having voter ID cards, and properly record those who shifted houses, whereas the 2025 method risks marking people as “shifted” and deleting them if forms sent to old addresses are not returned, with no strong verification at the new location. Overall, the authors argue that the older SIR was more inclusive and accountable, putting the onus on authorities to reach citizens, while the 2025 version demands that citizens chase paperwork and old records just to stay on the list, raising big questions for young and migrant voters about how safe their vote really is under the new rules.



Do you know if your name is still on the voter list—and should the system chase you or you chase the system? Tell your story below! 👇

bottom of page