🔥 SUPREME COURT CLASH OVER BIHAR VOTER ROLL REVISION! ⚖️
- MediaFx
- Jul 10
- 2 min read
TL;DR: India’s top court 🇮🇳 is hearing urgent petitions today (July 10, 2025) against the Election Commission’s “Special Intensive Revision” (SIR) of Bihar’s electoral rolls. Critics—including opposition parties, MPs like Mahua Moitra, Manoj Jha, Rahul Gandhi’s protest march, organisations like ADR, PUCL and activist Yogendra Yadav—say the mandatory document submission by July 25 will disenfranchise millions, especially the poor and migrants. ECI defends the SIR under Article 326 of the Constitution and reports more than 57% participation so far. The SC’s decision could impact voting rights ahead of Bihar assembly polls set for Oct–Nov.
🔥 What’s Going Down in the Supreme Court Today
The Supreme Court bench of Justices Dhulia and Bagchi is hearing a batch of petitions filed by political parties (INC, RJD, CPI, CPI(ML), TMC, NCP, DMK, Samajwadi Party), MPs (Mahua Moitra, Manoj Jha), NGOs (ADR, PUCL), activist Yogendra Yadav, among others.
Petitions challenge that SIR is “arbitrary,” “unconstitutional,” shifting proof burden to voters needing 11 types of documents—not even accepting Aadhaar or voter ID.
Opposition warns that enforcing SIR could disenfranchise “lakhs” (hundreds of thousands), even up to 3 crore voters in Bihar.
EC argues it’s legal under Article 324 and Sec. 21 of the Representation of People Act. Cites Article 326 to justify that only citizens aged 18+ must be on roll.
EC states more than 57% of Bihar’s 7.9 crore electorate (≈ 4.6 crore) have submitted forms, with timeline until July 25.
🚩 Political & Public Reactions
Rahul Gandhi led a protest march in Patna, calling it a replication of the “Maharashtra model” of electoral manipulation, joined by Tejashwi Yadav, D Raja, Dipankar Bhattacharya & more.
The Mahagathbandhan organized a bandh (“chakka jam”) in Bihar, disrupting daily life and amplifying dissent.
Meanwhile, ECI says the exercise is "enthusiastically participated" and being done house-to-house.
📋 Core Legal & Constitutional Issues
Issue | Details |
Burden of proof | Citizens must submit fresh forms and documents, failing which—delisting, even if they voted previously. |
Exclusion of usual IDs | Aadhaar, voter ID not accepted; even parental proof also needed. |
Timeline practicality | 30‑day deadline (by July 25) amid monsoons in Bihar; EC needs ~1 lakh booth-level officers to manage. |
Constitutional rights cited | Petitioners cite Articles 14, 19, 21, 325, 326 – claiming SIR violates democracy, equality, and adult suffrage. |
🌍 Why This Matters
Bihar has ~8 crore voters, and critics say enforcing this could lead to mass disenfranchisement, undermining democracy in the upcoming assembly elections (Oct–Nov).
The SC’s verdict could set a legal precedent for SIR processes nationwide—another petition seeks SIR across India.
If upheld, similar exercises may spread; if struck down, EC may need to revise SIR’s documentation demands and timelines.
✋ MediaFx’s Take (From the People’s Perspective)
From a working-class lens, democracy means EVERYONE gets to vote—not just those with perfect paperwork. 🗳️ While cleaning the voter list is good, forcing poor migrants to scramble for old ID in monsoon is unfair. The EC should simplify and include—not exclude. The Supreme Court must ensure empowerment of the common people, not their disenfranchisement.
🗣️ Your Thoughts?
Will mandatory SIR documents help protect electoral integrity, or hurt voters the most? Drop your thoughts below!👇
