₹17 Crore Loss Allegation: No Pre-Arrest Bail for Senthil Balaji
- pradeep
- 19 hours ago
- 2 min read
The Madras High Court has refused anticipatory bail to former Tamil Nadu minister and DMK MLA V Senthil Balaji in a corruption case registered by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption.
The court said the allegations involved an estimated loss of more than ₹17 crore to the public exchequer and held that custodial interrogation was necessary for the investigation.
Court Rejects Protection From Arrest
Senthil Balaji had approached the High Court seeking protection from arrest after the DVAC registered a case against him.
However, the court dismissed the plea, allowing investigators to continue the case without granting him pre-arrest protection.
The ruling does not amount to a finding of guilt. The allegations remain subject to investigation and trial.
Case Linked to TASMAC Operations
The case concerns alleged irregularities in the functioning of the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, commonly known as TASMAC, between 2021 and 2025.
The DVAC has alleged irregularities involving bar licences, transport contracts, transactions connected to breweries and distilleries, and other aspects of the state-run liquor distribution system.
Searches Conducted Across Tamil Nadu
As part of the investigation, DVAC teams reportedly carried out searches at 45 locations across Tamil Nadu.
Properties and offices linked to Senthil Balaji, his associates and TASMAC operations were among the places searched. Investigators said documents were seized, though the full outcome of the searches has not been officially disclosed.
Several Others Named in FIR
Apart from Senthil Balaji, the FIR reportedly names former TASMAC officials, his former personal assistant and alleged intermediaries.
The accused have been booked under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. All claims in the FIR remain allegations unless established before a court.
What Happens Next
With anticipatory bail denied, Senthil Balaji could face arrest and custodial questioning as the investigation moves forward.
The case is expected to intensify the political debate in Tamil Nadu, but the legal process will ultimately depend on evidence collected by investigators and examined by the courts.