🚨 NTSB Slams Speculation on Air India Crash – Don’t Jump to Conclusions!
- MediaFx
- 8 hours ago
- 2 min read
TL;DR:U.S. safety watchdog NTSB chief Jennifer Homendy warns media against blaming the Air India captain for the June 12 Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad, calling those reports “premature and speculative.” India’s AAIB also urges calm as investigations continue. Here’s what we know so far.
🔎 What’s the fuss?
NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy publicly criticized reports claiming Captain Sabharwal intentionally cut fuel switches, saying such stories are too early, speculative, and may mislead.
The AAIB’s preliminary findings confirmed fuel switches were moved to “cutoff” shortly after takeoff and clicked back to “run” about 10 seconds later—but did not name a culprit.
🛠 Status of the investigation
Loss of engine thrust happened within seconds as fuel was cut off—but who did it, and why remains unclear. Investigators haven’t ruled out mechanical issues, pilot error, or even sabotage.
The Federation of Indian Pilots slammed media outlets for bias, pointing out that pilot representatives weren’t included in the probe, and the preliminary report didn’t blame anyone.
India’s DGCA has ordered checks on fuel switch locks for all Boeing 737 and 787 jets. Air India says no faults found so far.
👤 Who’s involved?
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, had around 15,600 flight hours, including nearly 8,600 on the 787.
First Officer Clive Kunder, 32, was the pilot flying that day, logged about 3,400 hours, with 1,100 on the 787.
CVR transcript heard First Officer asking, “Why did you cut off fuel?”, and the Captain responded, “I did not do so”.
💬 Reaction & why this matters
NTSB: Full support to AAIB, saying any speculation now is risky.
AAIB & Civil Aviation Minister: Urge media and public to avoid forming narratives before the final report.
Pilot Unions: Demand transparency and inclusion of pilot voices; warn against damaging reputations.
🔍 Why the chatter?
With 260 tragic deaths (241 onboard + 19 on the ground), there’s massive public and media attention.
Aviation experts stress that fuel switch design and pilot cockpit procedures will be closely studied—this accident could lead to major changes in flight safety standards.
Could this uncover a pilot mental health or procedural failure issue? Debates on adding cameras in cockpits may heat up, similar to post-Germanwings crash in 2015.
🕰 What’s next?
Full investigation may take up to a year.
More cockpit audio details, technical analysis from Boeing/GE, and possible criminal inquiry by U.S. agencies are expected.
🗣 MediaFx POV
From the people’s perspective, it’s high time the powerful and media drop their rush for sensational blame. We need a solid, transparent probe that includes pilot voices, not early finger-pointing that traumatizes families and crews. Let truth lead—not ratings.
💬 Join the conversation!
What do you feel? Should media self-censor early reports? Do pilots deserve more protection until final proof? Comment below!
