šØ Devs Beware! Googleās Gemini CLI Tool Got PromptāHackedāExposing Your Secrets š±
- MediaFx

- Jul 31
- 3 min read
TL;DR:Ā Google rolled out Gemini CLIĀ in late June for coding tasks via terminal, but within just two days ā ļø, security researchers at Tracebit found a serious vulnerability. Attackers could trick developers into whitelisting a harmless tool like grep, then sneak malicious commands inside disguised files to exfiltrate environment variables and run arbitrary codeāall without extra prompts. Google patched it within days in version 0.1.14, adding stricter permission requests and clearer sandbox warnings. Developers are urged to update right away and avoid using the tool with untrusted code. š”ļø

What Happened? š§µ
Launch & Looming Risk:Ā Gemini CLI, based on Googleās Gemini LLM, is now part of the openāsource AI agent tools for developers. It allows natural language coding interactions and automatically executes shell commands via a whitelist mechanism.
TwoāStage Prompt Hack:Ā Tracebit experts demonstrated a clever exploit where a malicious prompt was hidden inside innocentālooking context files (like README.md). Once a developer whitelisted a benign command like grep, the attacker could execute malicious commands masquerading as that toolāresulting in silent execution and environment variable exfiltrationĀ via envĀ and curl.
Impact:Ā Attackers could steal credentials, run malware, or alter system filesāall without triggering warnings or requiring extra permissions.
Googleās Fix & Recommendations ā
Patch Release:Ā Google quickly pushed Gemini CLI v0.1.14, introducing features that list every shell command before execution and require explicit user consentĀ for suspicious actions.
Sandbox Options:Ā They reinforced sandboxing via Docker, Podman, and macOS Seatbelt. If sandboxing is disabled, Gemini displays a persistent red warning bannerĀ during sessions.
Doās & Donāts:Ā Update immediately, avoid running Gemini CLI on repositories or files from untrusted sources, and always enable sandboxing for high-risk workflows.
Why This Matters š
Agentic AI Risks:Ā AI coding agents like Gemini CLI and others (AutoāGPT, ChatGPT Agents SDK, etc.) execute real commands and need strong input validation. This incident shows how easily prompt injection can be weaponized in two stages: hidden payloads plus access via trusted commands.
Growing Threat Vectors:Ā According to OWASP, prompt injection is one of the top AI-related risksĀ for 2025, especially in toolāusing agents. Research such as InjecAgentĀ shows that agents even built on GPTā4 can be vulnerable in over 24% of test casesĀ due to indirect injection.
FootāinātheāDoor Method:Ā As seen in ReActĀ agents, harmless commands boost the success of later malicious ones by slipping into the agentās internal logicāraising the likelihood of chained exploits.
What Devs & Teams Should Do š ļø
MediaFx POV: From Peopleās Perspective š»
This scenario underscores how powerful tools can be turned into weaponsĀ when we don't guard our digital commons. From the peopleās perspective, developers and smaller toolāmakersāespecially in rural tech hubsāshouldnāt bear the brunt of corporate AI shortcuts. We need transparency, safer default settings, and communityādriven audits so that agentic tools donāt become yet another surveillance or exploitation layer. Google did patch Gemini fast, but the burden shouldn't fall on lone workers to protect their code alone. Collective vigilance and open audits should be the normāso that AI really serves the working class, and not corporate interests.
Comments š¬
What do you think, devs? Have you ever felt uneasy running CLI tools? Drop your thoughts or experiencesāletās chat below!
Generic Keywords:Ā #GeminiCLI #PromptInjection #AIsecurity #CyberHack #GoogleAI













































