top of page

"Constitution vs Manusmriti: šŸ”„ Why the RSS Needs to Break Its Silence! šŸ§"

MediaFx

TL;DR:Ā The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has historically shown a preference for the ancient text Manusmriti over India's Constitution. This stance raises concerns about the RSS's commitment to modern democratic values like equality and justice. It's crucial for the RSS to clarify its position to ensure alignment with the principles of contemporary India.

Constitution vs. Manusmriti: The Sangh's Stance Needs Clarity

Hey folks! šŸ‡®šŸ‡³ Let's dive into a topic that's been buzzing lately: the RSS's views on our Constitution versus the ancient Manusmriti. šŸ“œšŸ¤”

A Glimpse into History

Back in the day, when India was gearing up for independence, the RSS wasn't exactly cheering from the stands. šŸ“ On July 17, 1947, just a month before we got our freedom, their publication, Organiser, criticized the choice of the tricolor as our national flag, stating, "The tricolour will never be respected and owned by Hindus." They believed the three colors would have a negative psychological impact.

Fast forward to November 30, 1949, shortly after the Constituent Assembly adopted our Constitution, the same publication lamented the absence of ancient Bharatiya constitutional developments, particularly the Manusmriti. They emphasized that the laws from Manusmriti still influenced Hindus' daily lives.

Manusmriti: What's the Deal?

For those wondering, Manusmriti is an ancient legal text that dates back to between the 1st and 3rd centuries CE. It's been a cornerstone for traditional Hindu laws and societal norms. However, many of its principles, especially concerning caste and gender roles, clash with modern values of equality and justice.

The Sangh's Modern-Day Position

In recent times, RSS leaders have publicly praised the Constitution. For instance, Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrated the 75th anniversary of its adoption, highlighting its significance. But here's the kicker: there's still ambiguity about whether the RSS fully embraces the Constitution's core values or if they still hold the Manusmriti in higher regard.

Why This Matters

In a diverse and democratic nation like ours, clarity is crucial. If influential organizations like the RSS have reservations about the Constitution, it could have significant implications for our democratic fabric. The Manusmriti's hierarchical principles starkly contrast with the Constitution's emphasis on equality and justice.

Calling for Transparency

It's high time the RSS comes forward and clarifies its stance. Do they stand by the egalitarian principles enshrined in our Constitution, or do they still lean towards the age-old tenets of the Manusmriti? This clarity isn't just academic; it impacts how we envision our nation's future.

Join the Conversation

What are your thoughts on this? Do you think the RSS should make a clear statement about its position? Drop your comments below and let's get the discussion rolling! šŸ—£ļøšŸ‘‡

bottom of page