🎬 Naseeruddin Shah’s 🔥 Cryptic Clapback After Facing Twitter Storm! 🤯
- MediaFx
- 21 hours ago
- 2 min read
TL;DRVeteran Bollywood legend 🤴 Naseeruddin Shah posted a bold public defence of Punjabi superstar Diljit Dosanjh amid the Sardaar Ji 3 controversy 👊—supporting his casting of Pakistani actress Hania Aamir. After a fierce backlash from right-wing groups and film associations, Shah deleted his full post and replied with a cryptic quote about truth and courage 🕯️. Netizens are now debating if he stands strong or is bowing under pressure. Let’s break it down👇
🎥 What Really Happened?
1. Shah’s original bold messageOn June 30, Shah posted on Facebook:“I STAND FIRMLY WITH DILJIT. The dirty tricks deptt of Jumla Party has been awaiting a chance to attack him… I have close relatives and friends in Pakistan… Go to kailasa.”He took aim at political forces and praised Diljit’s open-mindedness and world‑view. #FreedomOfFriendship #NoBorderArt
2. Massive backlashBJP MLA Ram Kadam and filmmaker Ashoke Pandit slammed him—Kadam said Shah equated sacred Kailasa with Pakistan, while Pandit accused him of “frustration” and missing patriotism. Social media replies were split—some defended free speech; others called him anti‑national. #SelectiveOutrage
3. Post deleted, cryptic comebackAfter deleting the original, Shah shared:“It is almost impossible to carry the torch of truth through a crowd without singeing somebody’s beard.” —Georg Christoph LichtenbergThis became a viral moment—some hailed him for courage, others said he’s using “dramatic monologues” to dodge responsibility.
🔍 Why This Matters
Art vs. Politics: Diljit’s collaboration with Hania Aamir—despite Pahalgam terror attack tensions—triggered demands to ban him and block the film in India.
Shah’s stand: By openly backing Diljit, Shah challenged the politicisation of art and cross-border dialogue, but faced pressure to retreat.
Crowd power: Shah’s Lichtenberg quote points to the harsh effect of speaking the truth when it goes against the mob.
🧭 MediaFx Perspective (From the People’s View)
From a grassroots lens, this debate reflects a deeper need for people-to-people cultural connection and speaking truth—even if it ruffles feathers. When powerful voices retreat under political pressure, it weakens solidarity and stifles openness. Art should unite across borders, not be used as a political pawn. We salute Shah’s initial courage in putting humanity before ideology but urge everyone: keep standing for truthful dialogue—no matter how much it burns the crowd’s beard 🔥.
💭 Join the Conversation!
Should artists collaborate across the border—despite politics?
Is deleting posts after backlash honest, or cowardly?Speak your mind below!
