"Nag’s Villain Vibe in CoolieIs Setting Screens on Fire! 😈🔥"
- MediaFx
- 5 days ago
- 2 min read
TL;DR Nagarjuna Akkineni goes all-out as a menacing baddie named Simon in Coolie, acting opposite Rajinikanth. Fans threw grand celebrations across Hyderabad and Vizag—but social media reactions turned divided post-viewing. While some hail his dark swagger, others feel his screen time didn’t pack enough punch.
News Story (500-1000 words with youthful lingo, emojis, hashtags)
Heyyy lovely folks! Here’s the hot scoop on Nagarjuna’s menacing act in Coolie — buckle up! 😜🎬
Nagarjuna, or “Nag” as many call him, has dropped his usual charm and slipped into a dark, slick look as Simon, the chief villain in Coolie. This ain’t your typical villain—he’s cold, confident, and commands each frame with a lethal calmness that'll send chills down your spine.
Fans obviously went bonkers! In Hyderabad, theaters were decked out with posters, garlands, and even dhol beats to scream out “Advance Happy Birthday Annayya,” since his b’day is on August 29. Milk rituals, confetti showers—pure celebratory chaos. And in Vizag, they popped smoke bombs, waved custom flags, and set off fireworks!
But once the show ended, things got interesting. Social media lit up... and not all were impressed. Many viewers said Nagarjuna’s character felt underused—great look, meh screen time. “Movie was good, climax fun, but honestly, Nagarjuna’s character felt wasted,” one X user wrote. Another lamented both his and Sathyaraj’s characters didn’t get enough weight.
Film critics, meanwhile, are divided too. Some praised the film’s engrossing mix of action, suspense, and emotion—with Rajinikanth leading the charge and Nag’s villainous entry adding spice.
On the other hand, other reviewers felt Nag’s villain was “menacing and ruthless, but not very impactful,” suggesting his character fell short of expectations.
Even more critics pointed out that though Simon was introduced as a big bad boss, he feels more like a cameo and doesn’t leave a lasting mark—especially when Soubin’s Dayal steals the scene later on.
So bottomline: Nagarjuna packs swagger, stylish vibes, and menace—but the film's writing might not have let him shine enough.
MediaFx Opinion (People-first perspective)
Y’all, from the people’s lens, this is a real bummer. When a seasoned actor like Nag dares to go dark—after 33 years no less—as Shruti Haasan even pointed out, we ought to see that grit fully unleashed, not just taste of it.
We want more of that menace, deeper character arcs, and stories that empower performers—and by extension, us, the working-class folks craving real substance, not fluff. Cinema must serve the STORY, not just star power.
🔥 So fam, what do you think? Did Simon hit the mark or flop for you? Drop your take in comments! 👇 Should Nag do more villainous roles, or stick to his classy hero vibe?
