top of page
Search

Aurangzeb: Villain or Visionary? 🧐 Unpacking Nehru's Take Amidst Abu Azmi's Controversy

TL;DR: Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi's recent praise of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb has ignited debates. Historically, leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru viewed Aurangzeb critically, attributing the Mughal Empire's decline to his policies. This article delves into these perspectives and the ensuing political discourse.​

Hey folks! 🌟 So, there's quite a buzz 🐝 around Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi's recent comments praising Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. He claimed that during Aurangzeb's reign, India's borders stretched to Afghanistan and Burma (Myanmar) . But hold on! This isn't the first time Aurangzeb's legacy has been in the spotlight. Let's dive into how history remembers this Mughal ruler and what leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru had to say about him. 📜​

Abu Azmi's Controversial Remarks

Abu Azmi recently hailed Aurangzeb, stating that under his rule, India's borders extended to Afghanistan and Burma (Myanmar) . He also mentioned that the country was referred to as the "golden sparrow" during Aurangzeb's time . These remarks have sparked significant political backlash.​

Nehru's Perspective on Aurangzeb

Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister, had a nuanced view of Aurangzeb. In his book "The Discovery of India," Nehru described Aurangzeb as a "bigot and an austere puritan" whose policies, he believed, led to the decline of the Mughal Empire. Nehru wrote that Aurangzeb tried to "put back the clock" and, in doing so, "stopped it and broke it up" .​

Historical Actions and Policies

Aurangzeb's reign (1658–1707) is often characterized by his orthodox Islamic policies. He reintroduced the jizya tax on non-Muslims, which had been abolished by his predecessor, Akbar. Aurangzeb also ordered the destruction of several Hindu temples, including the renowned Kashi Vishwanath temple in Varanasi and the Kesava Deo temple in Mathura, replacing them with mosques . These actions have been cited by historians and leaders like Nehru as reasons for the empire's fragmentation.

Contemporary Debates and Political Reactions

Azmi's remarks have reignited debates about Aurangzeb's legacy. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis responded strongly, stating that Azmi would face legal action for his comments . Fadnavis emphasized that Aurangzeb cannot be considered a hero, not even by Muslims, and that glorifying him would not be tolerated .

MediaFx Opinion

From a working-class, socialist perspective, it's essential to critically assess historical figures like Aurangzeb. While some may view his expansionist policies as strengthening the empire, his actions against certain religious communities sowed seeds of division. These policies likely alienated large sections of the population, leading to resistance and contributing to the empire's decline. In today's context, glorifying such figures without acknowledging their complexities can perpetuate divisions. It's crucial to promote narratives that emphasize unity, equality, and the collective strength of all communities.​

Have Your Say!

What do you think about Aurangzeb's legacy? 🤔 Do you agree with Nehru's assessment, or do you have a different perspective? Drop your thoughts in the comments below! 💬👇

bottom of page